NEW ERA SCIENTOLOGY PROCESSING COMMANDS

HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE

Planet Earth

HCO BULLETIN OF 19 OCTOBER 2018

supersede

pilot process

all auditors

public distribution

NEW ERA SCIENTOLOGY PROCESSING COMMANDS

1. “Can you locate a point of equilibrium regarding _____?” (Item, subject, or

   terminal run)

2. “Is that composed of your charge, another beings charge, or multiple beings

    charge? (If there’s an instant read on beings or multiple beings then move

    to section A1 of this procedure.)

3. “Spot the point of equilibrium in that.”

4. “Now, spot the point of equilibrium in that again.”

5. “Now, spot the point of equilibrium in that again.”

6. “OK, is that a point equilibrium in:

                        Matter

                        Energy

                        Space

                        Time

                        Or;

                        Experience

If any in the above bracket reads you then indicate it to the pc with “Is that a point of equilibrium in _____?” and if the pc says it is or indicates it was another of the bracket then say, “I would like to indicate it is a point of equilibrium in _____.” Indicate whichever of these the pc states is the item whether it reads or not.

7. “Now, spot the point of equilibrium in that again.”

8. “Now, spot the point of equilibrium in that again.”

9. “Now, spot the point of equilibrium in that again.”

10. “Does that seem to be erasing or becoming more solid?”  

   If the pc says it is becoming more solid, then start again from step 1 of this

   Procedure. If it is erasing, then start again from step 3. Continue until EP

   and then continue with the same original difficulty, or run until a MAJOR

   EP (the definition is mentioned below) is obtained, or move onto something

   new to run altogether.

A1. “Can (he, she, they) locate a point of equilibrium in that?”

A2. “Now, have (him, her, them) spot the point of equilibrium in that”

A3. “Now, have (him, her, them) spot the point of equilibrium in that again.”

A4. “Now, have (him, her, them) spot the point of equilibrium in that again.”

A5. “Now, ask (him, her, them) is that a point equilibrium in:

                        Matter?

                        Energy?

                        Space?

                        Time?

                        Or;

                        Experience?

If any of the above bracket reads you merely indicate it to the other    being(s) with “Now ask (him, her, them) is that a point of equilibrium in _____?” and if the being(s) says it is or indicates it is another of the bracket then say, “Indicate to (him, her, them) that it is a point of equilibrium in _____.” Indicate whichever of these the other being(s) states is the item whether it reads or not.

A6. “Now, have (him, her, them) spot the point of equilibrium in that again.”

A7. “Now, have (him, her, them) spot the point of equilibrium in that again.”

A8. “Now, have (him, her, them) spot the point of equilibrium in that again.”

A7. “Does that seem to be erasing or becoming more solid?”  

      If the pc says it is becoming more solid, then start again from step A1 of

      this procedure. If it is erasing, then start again from step A2.

The procedure can be continued until a Minor EP (f/n, a small self-realization, and v.g.i’s), EP (f/n, with a cog related to the subject with some resolution, and v.g.i’s), or MAJOR EP (f/n, with major realization of the subject being run,  the achievement of Universal Basic with complete certainty of resolution , and v.v.g.i’s).

Ultimately we are aiming for the latter, but the rest will do when faced with time-constraints or other circumstances. An EP can occur at any point in this

procedure and if it does that is the point to leave off. Unless it is a minor EP and there are no barriers in auditing towards a MAJOR EP.

Another thing to note here is that at the same time a read occurs on the meter it is corresponding to the point of equilibrium in the pc’s mind or universe. So if they have any difficulty in locating one, or when repetitively spotting one; then indicate a read no matter how small. It can be as little as a tick or a stop of the needle; but once indicated it tends to open up the dial and whatever is being run.

So you cannot go wrong in indicating these as long as you never cut the pc’s communication in the process.

So there you have it! These are the most workable set of NEST commands and will produce case gain on the order of three-to-four times the amount of previous auditing. The wins and gains are also stable, and if a MAJOR EP is obtained, then you can add certainty to the mix.

Best of luck and this is the most potent tech that we have to date. So use it to the benefit of yourself and others — that is the real ticket.   

L. RON HUBBARD

Copyright © 2018

by L. Ron Hubbard

ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.